Highway would cut key first nations archeological sites
There is so much wrong with the South Fraser Perimeter Road that anywhere else this would be the issue that stopped it. In the Ontario EA process for a site search project I did - admittedly some years ago now - we decided to go for a site that was so comprehensively disturbed and so far from streams that there was no chance of archaelogical remains. Indeed one of the first EAs I worked on here at Bamberton on Vancouver Island, it was the First Nations concerns that made the proponent give up, because they realised that mitigation was simply not possible. Sacred sites are like that.
But the SFPR has impacts on existing communities, on a unique and fragile ecosystem, on farmland - but all of that is not enough to get the MoT to even consider the available alternative route, let alone the flawed case that it is needed at all. And the presence of a line in an old plan (which had not examined any of these issues) should have no effect on the appraisal. By any measure, the SFPR has failed to meet any reasonable standard of evaluation.
It amazes me that Metro Vancouver has not joined the fight. How can you talk about a future sustainable region and have the advocates of the Gateway on the platform? There is nothing about the Gateway that is even remotely connected to sustainability. And the government’s claim that it will reduce local air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions has been shown to be false. Use a flawed set of assumptions (there will be no induced traffic, there will be no change in land use)m and you get forecasts which no one with any understanding of the history of urban growth can accept. Indeed, I am certain that both Gordon Campbell and Kevin Falcon know that, but regard their indebtedness to the business community as being more important than their responsibilities to the wider community.
The most depressing aspect of all this to me is the attitude of the First Nations. But these are their concerns - and I understand that they feel that a newcomer like me has no standing in this discussion. It is not my story to tell. I just wish that they would tell their story more forcefully and publicly. The lack of comment in this Sun piece is distressing, for this was an opportunity to take and possibly make some change. The Juggernaut of the Gateway needs some obstacles thrown in its path, to slow its progress before it flattens us all. We know this government does not care about the environment, or the community. But there are some groups that have to listen to - and that is not the farmers, or the defenders of Burns Bog, or the people who live along the present chosen route. They can expect to be ignored - and have been. But the reality of the present treaty process does give the First Nations a voice. And a voice that has power.
It needs to be heard along the Fraser.
NOW








mr. rees –I asked gordon campbell a couple of questions on the bill good show on tuesday april 22 - on the 9am to 10 am segment. he danced around my questions, if your curious cknw has an audio vault so you can hear the segment –campbell was on between 915 am to 10 am my questions ( I was the only tough questions to the gargler) were about 9.50 am
[moderator's note - I have inserted the link into the text of this comment]
thanks mr. rees——-I really am a computer idiot, this whole computer thing is new to me , I only touched a computer a year ago –self taught– and old used equipment. signed………………………………….brian grant g
One of my best friends is an archaeologist with much knowledge about cultural resources management. I’ll send her this post.