Stephen Rees's blog

Thoughts about the relationships between transport and the urban area it serves

Paris to ban older cars

with 4 comments

BY proposing to reduce air pollution by banning vehicles made before 1997, Mayor Bertrand Delanoë has angered vintage car owners and motorist groups and raised concerns among those who say they cannot afford new cars.

That is the first paragraph of a New York Times story last week - and is an admirable example of summary of the story.  And much better than the Grist follow up which is just facetious, but at least made it to my twitter stream this morning. It is not that there are no local stories – just that Voony, Gord Price and Eric Doherty are beating me to the blog. And, it just so happens that I happen to have a set of flickr pictures I took when in Paris earlier this year of some very nice classic cars.

Deux Chevaux

There are apparently 367,000 vehicles that would be affected. Just how many that is as a percentage of the fleet is not mentioned. Nor is the fact that old collector cars tend not to be used every day – unless there is some special reason.

Another big old Bentley

An old (British built) Bentley, used as a wedding limo in Paris

There are some 2CVs (they look like the one above) that are used to drive tourists around the city. I think the Woody Allen film has probably cemented the idea for all that one of the reasons for visiting Paris is an attempt to re-visit its history. It is a lovely idea that one could be picked up by some antique vehicle to whisk you off to a party with Fitzgeralds, Hemingway and Dali. I would settle for the opportunity to see again the Paris on 1964 – just for the old cars, old trains and older buses that were running then, when I first visited. In those days, the streets were full of French cars. These days, it is not just Europe that has become the “home” manufacturer – but the far eastern volume makers too. The street scene, automotively speaking, is more like everywhere else.

Renault Twizy

Renault Twizy

Though I doubt you would see one of these anywhere else.

I think it is right that there is a move to make the city a low emission zone, and, as with Greater Vancouver, the decline of manufacturing industry means that cars have become – proportionately – the main source of air polluting emissions in the city. And the opportunities for other kinds of mobility are far greater in Paris than here. We, of course, do not ban old cars. They get grandfathered emissions standards, but we do have the, very successful, ScrapIt program,  and ICBC does give special status to collector vehicles that have very low usage limits set on them. That does not mean they cannot be licensed for everyday use, of course, nor do we have the sort of mandatory vehicle safety testing program that gets dangerous clunkers off the road elsewhere. They don’t even have to be all that old – just cars that are not properly maintained, which is not usually the case for collector vehicles but can, too often, be the case for older cars used by people who cannot afford to pay for preventative maintenance – and will often have several older donor vehicles in order to keep one runner going.

Citroen XM

I will admit to an affection for the daring designs and technological innovation of Citröens – I did not see any of the lovely DS Pallas that the NYT features at the top of their story – this XM was later and less attractive.  But the French are by no means exclusive in their affections and still run classics like the original (British) Mini or (Italian) Fiat 500 (“cinquecento”)

Mini

FIAT 500

These were real small cars unlike their repro modern equivalents. And while their tailpipes might not be as pristine in terms of common air contaminants, they were certainly very fuel efficient because they were light cars with tiny engines. Obviously it is better that people walk, ride bikes or use transit. But if they are going to use a car, surely there is less CO2 emitted from either of these  than an SUV. Or – the ones that make me especially irritated – the huge pick up truck with the off road tires.

The need for a ban is apparently driven by European air quality directives. And if that is the way that Paris can meet these then I suppose that is the way it has to be. In general, I think that there are usually better ways of ensuring compliance. And if we are going to ban vehicles then perhaps we should turn our attention as well to the needless huge, gas guzzlers – and the high performance vehicles which are designed to be operated at race track speeds which ought never to be permitted on public use roadways.

Ferrari

These things have so much power the problem is keeping them within legal speeds – and earlier versions (prior to EFI) used to die in traffic congestion. But really, does anyone actually need to have this kind of performance available in a city bound runabout? Anymore than they need a Hummer?

Model T Ford

Model T Ford on the Champs Elysees

Amphibious car

Amphibious car on the Seine, near the Tour Eiffel

Written by Stephen Rees

November 26, 2012 at 12:01 pm

Posted in cars, Environment

Tagged with ,

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Sacrebleu, if we can’t not even drive a “deuche” in Paris, it must be a good reason to opt out of EU. or immigrate to Vancouver:

    https://maps.google.ca/?ll=49.262484,-123.089372&spn=0.003746,0.009795&t=m&z=17&layer=c&cbll=49.262487,-123.089237&panoid=isrsJvkZCpWaNUIZcLx2fg&cbp=12,290.47,,1,6.01

    (it must be RedFrog driving ;)
    (I have my personal collection of french car in Vancouver, including a DS, but I was happy with the find above…I guess you didn’t got a chane to spot a Citroen SM either)

    More seriously: in Paris all the cabs are diesel powered, so if you want really fight pollution to start to face the cab looby, and not finger at a handle of vintage car

    Voony

    November 26, 2012 at 9:17 pm

  2. Sorry Voony..I never drove in Paris..only used the metro and buses there.
    I lived and worked in the Dordogne region. My rented house (genuine Art Deco–1930s for those not familiar with that style) was the newest in town by far…
    My car was a Fiat 850, just like the one in the photo. It had had a max speed of 120 and was doing great at 100-110.. a couple of times I had the needle vibrating by 120, not that there were many roads where I could go that “fast”.

    I did drive the 2 CV of a colleague a few times and loved it…the independent suspension on each wheel, was perfect for the rough terrain around houses we built and the shift stick was forgiving. I never knew if I was in 2nd or 3rd. A couple of times I couldn’t find the reverse so I just grabbed the back and turned the car around.
    My boss let me drive his big Peugeot a few times, but no one was allowed to drive his big heavy British car (It had a steering wheel in the center, 3 separate seats in front, a 3 persons bench and 2 folding seats in the back). It could have been a Bentley..

    Red frog

    November 27, 2012 at 3:08 pm

  3. And in Canada I never bothered with a car…

    Red frog

    November 27, 2012 at 3:11 pm

  4. Red Frog: Why can’t you be bothered with a car? I thought Canada was supposed to be quite a car-orientated place….

    James

    November 28, 2012 at 8:28 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,067 other followers

%d bloggers like this: