Stephen Rees's blog

Thoughts about the relationships between transport and the urban area it serves

Small triumph for social media

with 2 comments

It’s press release Thursday. This one come from the BCAA with the headline “BCAA unveils 2013 Top 10 “Worst Roads” list: Kelowna’s Westside Road, Vancouver bike path and George Massey Tunnel take top spots”

Bike path makes ‘worst’ roads list

This year, a surprising twist occurred with Vancouver’s BC Parkway, a bike path, leading the pack throughout the survey and landing in second place.

“It was really interesting to see a bike path get nominated which shows that cycling safety is an on-going concern and cyclists really see bike paths as their roads,” says Cousin [Ken Cousin, BCAA’s associate vice president of Road Assist]. “The bike path making the top 10 ‘Worst Roads’ list speaks volumes about the need to ensure cyclists—and pedestrians, for that matter—have safe places to commute, which helps reduce the risk of traffic collisions for all road users.”

The reason it got on the list was that it was nominated by Patrick Johnstone on his NWimby blog and then promoted on twitter, where it was picked up by the cycling advocates The British Columbia Cycling Coalition and HUB: Your Cycling Connection. Since few people actually go to the BCAA site to vote for their roads, and they get spread all over the province, it is not too difficult for organized activists to influence the vote. My twitter stream is regularly populated by tweets trying to influence on line polls – especially those on main stream media. These are, of course, unscientific measures of opinion, and no one tries to measure how representative the sample is compared to the rest of the population. Equally no-one pretends that they are either.

Even so, I want to draw attention to number three – the Massey Tunnel – just in case my vote influenced things at all. I was annoyed by the way the map selection tool worked on the survey. Since what I wanted to draw attention to is not the congestion on Highway #99 – but rather than on Steveston Highway. At that time I lived there – and saw the daily back up of traffic, queueing to get into the tunnel which sometimes got as far back as Number 4 Road – and always well past Shell. I used to have to plan my trips to avoid that length of road in the mid afternoon. The problem is the intersection. Some work is going on as a result of the re-development of the Fantasy gardens site at the intersection of Steveston Highway with No 5 Road. But that stops at the boundary (CoR/MoT) – because the Ministry is responsible for the two lane overpass. And that is now a real barrier to local movement as the rest of Steveston Highway is 4 four lanes – and the SilverCity Riverport complex generates lots of trips. My views on the tunnel are here.

But it is one thing to get #2 place on an online poll, it is quite another to get something done about it. The BC Parkway was built at the time of the Expo line, but it was not part of that project. SRY still operated freight trains under the SkyTrain – and the budget then was for transit, not walking or cycling. The Parkway was partly funded by sponsors Molson and 7-Eleven in return for naming rights. They did not contribute to maintenance or improvements which quickly became evident. Some improvement did take place in Central Park, where the bike path used to use a winding path through the rhododendrons – the site of my first major cycling crash. Not that I think my broken wrist had anything much to do with the improvement.

BC Parkway at Patterson

What is left of the crash site

Translink at least now has some commitment to cycling and walking. Not enough but its a start. And Burnaby does seem to be able to get itself moving on these issues. The Central Valley Greenway, for instance was an initiative of Translink, with contributory funding from the feds (back when they cared about GHG reduction) and Burnaby. But in order to get something done, there will have to be co-operation again between municipalities and Translink ought to be able to organize that. The problem right now is that they are more focussed on major strategic issues – and the line up for more immediate fixes to the system as a whole is longer than they can deal with.

In the coming weeks, the Association will provide the complete survey results to municipalities and the provincial Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to encourage improvements.

Well I hope they BCAA has the sense to work with BCCC and HUB on this one. And maybe someone with an eye for publicity can round up some more sponsors. With a longer term commitment this time please.

Written by Stephen Rees

June 6, 2013 at 10:22 am

Posted in cycling

Tagged with

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. …I wanted to draw attention to is not the congestion on Highway #99 – but rather than on Steveston Highway. […] The problem is the intersection. Some work is going on […] at the intersection of Steveston Highway with No 5 Road. But that stops at the boundary (CoR/MoT) – because the Ministry is responsible for the two lane overpass. And that is now a real barrier to local movement as the rest of Steveston Highway is 4 four lanes

    No, the problem is not the intersection but the city of Richmond, which do whatever is in its power, to encourage rat running off the Hwy #99: rat running is the real problem

    …and it is a problem engineered for probably some reason.

    All the people you see don’t go to Silvercity (especially in the afternoon), but they come from Vancouver, either via Arthur Laing bridge, or Oak bridge (where they exit at n4 road). and want all go into the tunnel.

    Rather than widening number 4 road, like Richmond city is doing, what is encouraging rat runners, which fatally land on Stevenson highway…And because MOT doesn’t use traffic timer at interchange, it is making the thing worse on Hwy 99, so encouraging more rat running…

    Other side of the freeway, there is similar problem with people coming from Knight bridge

    Easing traffic on all NS road parallel to Hwy #99 (and Steveson) will makes the problem only worse. In fact it is the reverse Richmond should be doing, putting traffic calming here and there, to discourage rat running.

    there are also rat runner blocking bridgeport from number 6 road (WB), or number 5 (EB), and guess what…Richmond is windening number 6 !

    All the traffic problems Richmond is facing are engineered by its transportation engineers.

    Voony

    June 6, 2013 at 10:37 pm

  2. “Rather than widening number 4 road, like Richmond city is doing, what is encouraging rat runners, which fatally land on Stevenson highway…” should have been:

    “widening number 4 road, like Richmond city is doing, is encouraging rat runners, which fatally land on Stevenson highway…”😉

    Voony

    June 6, 2013 at 11:47 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: