Stephen Rees's blog

Thoughts about the relationships between transport and the urban area it serves

We don’t need no consultation!

with 2 comments

It is not often I find myself in complete agreement with a spokesperson of the BC NDP. But this evening I heard an interview with B.C. NDP Justice Critic Mike Farnworth on CBC  

“I expected more than a hashtag consultation. I was expecting some leadership shown and some action taken,” he said.

“We know what the problem is. Distracted driving — people texting, people using cell phones while driving — kills people. There’s nothing to consult on.”

BC’s penalties for distracted driving are the lowest in Canada. The BC government thinks it ought to consult on the problem: distracted driving here is now the second leading cause of death due to vehicle collisions, exceeding alcohol but still less than speed.

If you feel so inclined you can be part of the process. That is if you think the paucity of the penalty is the problem.

No doubt after all this song and dance the penalty will increase but nothing much else will actually change. Because the problem is not the perception of the size of the penalty but the perception of the probability of being caught. Most people using hand held electronic devices in their cars while driving know they are breaking the law, but they don’t see it as dangerous. Anymore than they see speeding as dangerous. Or queue jumping, running stale amber lights, parking in bike lanes … and so on. And they know for an absolute certainty that the probability of being caught is about as low as winning the lottery. They still buy lottery tickets of course.

If you could actually catch speeders when they commit the offence you could reduce speeding. Well, we all know what happened to that don’t we. It was unpopular with speeders – so it was dropped like a hot brick. Do you think that the BC Liberals are actually serious about upsetting all those people who continue to take important calls and those crucial text messages they must send? There will be consultation and those angry with other people they see texting will be vociferous. But behaviour will change little if at all. And there will be media events and other hoopla about periodic crackdowns – especially after some well documented collision. Expect a crackdown whenever something newsworthy happens. That probably doesn’t mean your Granny having a near miss on a marked crosswalk.

I suppose I ought to be able to condense that to 140 characters. But I can’t so its a blog post.

Written by Stephen Rees

June 16, 2015 at 8:26 pm

Posted in Road safety

Tagged with

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. France has just introduced a bill on “distracted driving” for the reason you mention (http://www.sudouest.fr/2015/06/18/securite-routiere-et-telephone-tout-ce-que-vous-ne-pourrez-plus-faire-au-1er-juillet-1955825-4755.php )

    It is forbidden for operator of vehicle (car truck, motorbike, mopette and bike) to wear any apparatus able to emit sound (lphone conversation, music,…)

    it is also forbidden to look at any screen other the ones prescribed by the laws, eat while driving…fine is €135 and 3 demerit points (I guess the later apply only for vehicle requiring a driving license).

    Notice again, the law apply to cyclist…for good reason ( http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847811000684 )…

    Voony

    June 18, 2015 at 9:13 am

  2. Meeting of great minds..I was reading Sud-Ouest minutes before reading Stephen’s post!

    Red frog

    June 18, 2015 at 11:20 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: